On Thursday 16 June 2005 16:20, Russell Howe wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 June 2005 15:44, Russell Howe wrote:
> >>We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the
> >>status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of
> >>both returned
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 16 June 2005 15:44, Russell Howe wrote:
>
>>We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the
>>status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of
>>both returned - is this how it should be?
>
>
> The status is given for
On Thursday 16 June 2005 15:44, Russell Howe wrote:
> We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the
> status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of
> both returned - is this how it should be?
The status is given for all the drives known to the SD.
Hello,
Russell Howe wrote:
We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the
status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of
both returned - is this how it should be?
I assume that's how it works, at least I never saw it differently.
Also, the na
We have two tape drives, connected to the same box. When I request the
status of one of the corresponding storage devices, I get the status of
both returned - is this how it should be?
Also, the name of the storage device isn't shown for the jobs - only the
device names on the sd box. So, unless y
