Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

2013-01-16 Thread Silver Salonen
On 16.01.2013 18:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 > Director on the server? > > major.minor.release Hi. Officially, don't try t

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

2013-01-16 Thread Dan Langille
On 2013-01-16 11:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always > be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version > 5.2.12 > Director on the server? I accidentally ran something similar to that r

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

2013-01-16 Thread compdoc
In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on the same minor release number" So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 Director on the server? major.minor.release --