Am 16.03.2012 09:58, schrieb Simone Caronni:
> Makes sense?
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=964c4995e7d7c6cb820ecbb4b0c4ed58b1cbb4ed
Looks good.
> I removed all *sql libs in my system and tried to install client and
> console, no libraries are pulled in.
Ve
Makes sense?
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=964c4995e7d7c6cb820ecbb4b0c4ed58b1cbb4ed
I removed all *sql libs in my system and tried to install client and
console, no libraries are pulled in.
Regards,
--Simone
On 16 March 2012 09:30, Simone Caronni wrote:
> H
Hello,
> On my CentOS 6 machines, "bacula-client" pulled in "mysql" which weighs
> a hefty 2.4 MB all by its own. But size is not my point.
The bacula-client does not pull in mysql-server, only mysql-libs.
There's a problem here, can you post me the dependency that yum
generates upon installation
Am 14.03.2012 10:20, schrieb Simone Caronni:
> If you want to use 5.2.6 you need to use the repository at:
>
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
>
> These are backported rawhide packages that I mantain and will be the
> default in next Fedora releases and (I think) RH
Hello,
in CentOS and EPEL you only find outdated clients, in EPEL there's
only 2.4.4, in CentOS there's the RHEL-supported 5.0.0. that
unfortunately has a lot of bugs open.
If you want to use 5.2.6 you need to use the repository at:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:15:36PM -0400, John Drescher wrote:
> > Not sure I follow, I'm on CentOS but isn't there only one Linux client?
> > I can't find any decent install procedures that don't come with other
> > software on top of bacula.
> >
>
> You will have to ask Centos how they packaged
Am 13.03.2012 18:15, schrieb John Drescher:
> You will have to ask Centos how they packaged bacula. Each
> distribution has its own install procedure and packages its own
> version of bacula. If they do not offer a trimmed down bacula you can
> compile one yourself. The source code is easily availa
On 03/13/12 12:58, Babadostov, Imanuel G [Contractor] wrote:
> I’m wondering if there is a way to install a standalone (minimal) client of
> bacula on my systems instead of installing SQL and web based management on
> each of my machines?
>
> I am trying to control them all from one server running
> Not sure I follow, I'm on CentOS but isn't there only one Linux client?
> I can't find any decent install procedures that don't come with other
> software on top of bacula.
>
You will have to ask Centos how they packaged bacula. Each
distribution has its own install procedure and packages its ow
re Services
Department of the Interior
w.303.231.3644
imanuel.babados...@bsee.gov
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Babadostov, Imanuel G [Contractor]
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [B
> I’m wondering if there is a way to install a standalone (minimal) client of
> bacula on my systems instead of installing SQL and web based management on
> each of my machines?
>
That would depend on your distribution. On my distribution gentoo I
ask for client only and get only the client.
John
I'm wondering if there is a way to install a standalone (minimal) client
of bacula on my systems instead of installing SQL and web based
management on each of my machines?
I am trying to control them all from one server running with Webmin and
would like the bare minimum needed (with minimal chang
12 matches
Mail list logo
