Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling vs buffering (was: Autochanger Configuration Help)

2019-02-14 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, czw., 7 lut 2019 o 02:34 Adam Nielsen napisał(a): > > Spooling can reduce overall throughput because the data is > > sequentially written to disk and then read back. > > This is what got me. I thought it was a buffer to ride out variations > in disk read speed (like the mbuffer program)

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling vs buffering (was: Autochanger Configuration Help)

2019-02-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Adam, In message <20190207113145.144af...@teln.shikadi.net> you wrote: > > Spooling can reduce overall throughput because the data is > > sequentially written to disk and then read back. > > This is what got me. I thought it was a buffer to ride out variations > in disk read speed (like the

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling vs buffering (was: Autochanger Configuration Help)

2019-02-06 Thread Adam Nielsen
> Spooling can reduce overall throughput because the data is > sequentially written to disk and then read back. This is what got me. I thought it was a buffer to ride out variations in disk read speed (like the mbuffer program) but it's not. The purpose is to get data off clients as fast as poss