Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-07 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, sorry that it took some time... On 6/2/2006 5:05 PM, Baptiste Malguy wrote: > Hello, > > I wish I could get more precise details for my case. Let's consider > backup are only made on some disks. > > In bacula-dir.conf, in Job resources, we may set Spool Data attribute to > yes. From the onl

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-06 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Tuesday 06 June 2006 10:32, Baptiste Malguy wrote: >> Christoph Litauer wrote: >>> Baptiste Malguy schrieb: [...] 3 - By the way, what do you think of havin a single ~ 60GB disk volume or several smaller 5-10GB volumes ? Does anyone has some background abou

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 10:32, Baptiste Malguy wrote: > Christoph Litauer wrote: > > Baptiste Malguy schrieb: > >> Hello, > > [...] > > >> Here are my questions: > >> > >> 1 - Is it just the OS that takes so long to set its index to the content > >> of the disk volume (file) or is it Bacula that tr

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-06 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Christoph Litauer wrote: > Baptiste Malguy schrieb: >> Hello, [...] >> Here are my questions: >> >> 1 - Is it just the OS that takes so long to set its index to the content >> of the disk volume (file) or is it Bacula that treats a disk volume as a >> cartridge, with sequential access instead of ra

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-06 Thread Christoph Litauer
Baptiste Malguy schrieb: > Hello, > > I wish I could get more precise details for my case. Let's consider > backup are only made on some disks. > > In bacula-dir.conf, in Job resources, we may set Spool Data attribute to > yes. From the online doc, you can read: "This option should not be used >

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-05 Thread Christoph Litauer
Arno Lehmann schrieb: > Hi, > > On 6/2/2006 9:00 AM, Christoph Litauer wrote: >> Dear bacula users, >> >> I currently backup about 15 linux/windows servers to a LTO streamer. For >> increased restore speed I want no parallel (interleaving) backups on the >> tapes. So I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-02 Thread Baptiste Malguy
Hello, I wish I could get more precise details for my case. Let's consider backup are only made on some disks. In bacula-dir.conf, in Job resources, we may set Spool Data attribute to yes. From the online doc, you can read: "This option should not be used if you are writing to a disk file". I de

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-02 Thread Christoff Buch
Hi Christoph, I've written my answers in your text... Dear bacula users, I currently backup about 15 linux/windows servers to a LTO streamer. For increased restore speed I want no parallel (interleaving) backups on the tapes. So I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" of the tape storage to 1.

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 6/2/2006 9:00 AM, Christoph Litauer wrote: > Dear bacula users, > > I currently backup about 15 linux/windows servers to a LTO streamer. For > increased restore speed I want no parallel (interleaving) backups on the > tapes. So I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" of the tape storage to 1. > >

[Bacula-users] Spooling parallel, Despooling sequential

2006-06-02 Thread Christoph Litauer
Dear bacula users, I currently backup about 15 linux/windows servers to a LTO streamer. For increased restore speed I want no parallel (interleaving) backups on the tapes. So I set "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" of the tape storage to 1. On the other hand, collecting data should happen in parallel on