OTECTED]>
> A: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: 30 gennaio 2007 20.16.33 CET
> Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Solved why Windows FD 1.38 sometime is slow
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 18:41, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Gabriele Bulfon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Data: 30 gennaio 2007 20.16.33 CET
Oggetto: Re: [Bacula-users] Solved why Windows FD 1.38 sometime is slow
Hello,
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 18:41, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> I had headaches for a week, trying to figu
tto:
RE: [Bacula-users] Solved why Windows FD 1.38 sometime is slow
It sounds like Flow Control might bedisabled on one of the adapters.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Gabriele Bulfon
Sent:
Tuesday, January 30, 20079:42 AM
To:
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
It sounds like Flow Control might be disabled on one of the adapters.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gabriele
Bulfon
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 9:42 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Solved why Windows FD 1.38
Hello,
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 18:41, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> I had headaches for a week, trying to figure out why some windows FDs were
> VERY slow compared to all the rest of FDs. These slow clients were all
> rating at around 1Mb/s. After playing a bit with many system and bacula
> paramete
I had headaches for a week, trying to figure out why some windows FDs were VERY
slow compared
to all the rest of FDs. These slow clients were all rating at around 1Mb/s.
After playing a bit with many system and bacula parameters, I decided not to
trust what was stated in the manual: "the default
