Is anyone else running Bacula 9.0.6 on Gentoo Linux on the Gentoo 17.0
system-wide-PIE profile?
I just ran my first full backup to tape since migrating all my Gentoo
boxes to the 17.0 profile, and every job took at least twice as long to
run as the previous Full backup cycle, most taking three to
> I have seen that in the past like 3 times in 10 years (around 30
> thousand completed jobs) but in no way is that is not normal. I would
> look for an updated version of bacula. 5.26 is the current version
Am building 5.2.6 by hand now as 5.0.0 was the latest in the Scientific
Linux repository.
> I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific
> Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the
> Bacula server and am experiencing two odd problems:
>
> i) disk volumes created by Bacula are changing their state to Error with the
> messa
Are you doing compression or encryption? And if so which? If the files are
large I found that those can really slow down the transfers.
---Guy
(via iPhone)
On 19 May 2012, at 01:00, Graham Worley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientifi
Hello,
I've just started using Bacula having installed the RPMs from the Scientific
Linux distro. I'm trying to back up several machines to disk file on the Bacula
server and am experiencing two odd problems:
i) disk volumes created by Bacula are changing their state to Error with the
message
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:18 +0100, Sebastian Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Do 06.11.2008 15:54 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:57 +0100, Sebastian Lehmann wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Am Di 04.11.2008 21:02 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
> > >
Hi,
Am Do 06.11.2008 15:54 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:57 +0100, Sebastian Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Di 04.11.2008 21:02 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from di
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 14:57 +0100, Sebastian Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Di 04.11.2008 21:02 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
> > to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s.
> >
> > full ba
Hi,
Am Di 04.11.2008 21:02 schrieb Ulrich Leodolter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
> to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s.
>
> full backup job size varies from 10-50GB.
>
> Pool setup is simple, just one pool for full an
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:00:19PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> > >
> > > Job {
> > > Name = "CopyDiskToTape"
> > > Type = Copy
> > > Client = dir-fd
> > >
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> >
> > Job {
> > Name = "CopyDiskToTape"
> > Type = Copy
> > Client = dir-fd
> > Level = Full # must be defined, but is ignored
> > FileSet = "F
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
>
> Job {
> Name = "CopyDiskToTape"
> Type = Copy
> Client = dir-fd
> Level = Full # must be defined, but is ignored
> FileSet = "Full Set" # must be defined, but is ignored
> Pool = DiskBackup
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
> > > to tape (DiskCo
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 23:37 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Prob
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
> > to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s.
> >
> > full backup job size varies fr
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
> to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s.
>
> full backup job size varies from 10-50GB.
>
> Pool setup is simple, just one pool for full an incremen
Hi,
Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup)
to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s.
full backup job size varies from 10-50GB.
Pool setup is simple, just one pool for full an incremental backups
to disk (automatic recycle works good)
Pool {
Name = DiskBackup
P
I've noticed that when my backup server (running 1.38.2) is backing up
itself, the performance is terrible. The load average on the box goes
through the roof, and I'm getting something like 60 bytes per second.
The backup server is running on an older 1.7GHz machine, but still it
should be pl
18 matches
Mail list logo
