On Friday 24 February 2006 17:54, Ian Levesque wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are simultaneously
> writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't respond
> gracefully. This is only a problem when two jobs are running on the
> tape, not
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:32, Ian Levesque wrote:
> Hello Kern,
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > In fact, the output that I saw seemed to me to be non-fatal
>
> What do you suppose worst-case scenario is here -- that roughly 64512
> bytes may be lost at the end of the t
Hello Kern,
On Feb 28, 2006, at 3:19 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
In fact, the output that I saw seemed to me to be non-fatal
What do you suppose worst-case scenario is here -- that roughly 64512
bytes may be lost at the end of the tapes?
My best guess is a tape defect. If it happens with
On Monday 27 February 2006 22:03, Ian Levesque wrote:
> Hi Kern, et al,
>
> > I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are
> > simultaneously
> > writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't
> > respond
> > gracefully. This is only a problem when two jo
Hi Kern, et al,
I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are
simultaneously
writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't
respond
gracefully. This is only a problem when two jobs are running on
the
tape, not when a single job is running.
Are you spooling to disk
On Monday 27 February 2006 18:32, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Ian Levesque wrote:
> >>> I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are simultaneously
> >>> writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't respond
> >>> gracefully. This is only a problem when two job
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Ian Levesque wrote:
I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are simultaneously
writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't respond
gracefully. This is only a problem when two jobs are running on the tape,
not when a single job is running.
Are
Hi Alan,
I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are
simultaneously writing to the same tape. When the tape ends,
Bacula doesn't respond gracefully. This is only a problem when two
jobs are running on the tape, not when a single job is running.
Are you spooling to disk or writi
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Ian Levesque wrote:
I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are simultaneously writing
to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't respond gracefully. This
is only a problem when two jobs are running on the tape, not when a single
job is running.
Are
Hi Folks,
I've noticed a pattern in my backups when two jobs are simultaneously
writing to the same tape. When the tape ends, Bacula doesn't respond
gracefully. This is only a problem when two jobs are running on the
tape, not when a single job is running. I assume that only the final
64k
10 matches
Mail list logo
