[Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread DMS
I am using 5.x, the one that comes in the Ubuntu 10.04 repository. I think I see what you mean by having the schedule override the storage. I have been using the Webmin console which is good for most of what I have to do, but I have had to manually edit for wildcard file sets and what not. I did

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
It actually makes perfect sense, since you can have several different jobs (maybe with different fileset, for example) for one single client configuration... Anyway, I guess your problem is solved now... :) Em 17 de janeiro de 2012 17:10, DMS escreveu: > Never mind. I guess it bases it off of jo

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:24 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> Never mind. I guess it bases it off of job name and not client name. Doesn't >> make sense to me, but I don't code either =). >> >> I can't do what I want to do, but I guess I can split up clients to >> different locations instead of backu

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread John Drescher
> Never mind. I guess it bases it off of job name and not client name. Doesn't > make sense to me, but I don't code either =). > > I can't do what I want to do, but I guess I can split up clients to different > locations instead of backup types. > I believe you can use the schedule resource to d

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 1:38 PM, DMS wrote: > Right now I have all my backups going to a 6 TB raid array. I am trying to > keep the fulls on the array, and the Incrementals on another mounted 600 GB > storage drive. The storage directors and everything are setup correctly, jobs > run just fine,

Re: [Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Which version of bacula are you using? I remember having the same problem with 3.x, but it got resolved on 5.x... Em 17 de janeiro de 2012 16:38, DMS escreveu: > Right now I have all my backups going to a 6 TB raid array. I am trying to > keep the fulls on the array, and the Incrementals on anot

[Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread DMS
Never mind. I guess it bases it off of job name and not client name. Doesn't make sense to me, but I don't code either =). I can't do what I want to do, but I guess I can split up clients to different locations instead of backup types. +--

[Bacula-users] Seperate storage for fulls and Incs.

2012-01-17 Thread DMS
Right now I have all my backups going to a 6 TB raid array. I am trying to keep the fulls on the array, and the Incrementals on another mounted 600 GB storage drive. The storage directors and everything are setup correctly, jobs run just fine, except that they are upgrading themselves to a full