Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-20 Thread Jason King
That got it fixed! I just needed to install the 64 bit version of the bacula-client. I assumed the 64bit version would be available from bacula.org through their sourceforge CVS but apparently someone else maintains the 64bit version. Who would have known. Anyway...thanks for the tip. jason R

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-17 Thread Felix Schwarz
Ryan Novosielski schrieb: > RHEL4.1 and RHEL4.4 are not even that similar as pertains to version > numbers. Furthermore, all RHEL-RPMs assume a fully patched system that has the highest update level currently available (e.g. update 4 for RHEL 4). If you do use older versions of RHEL with the la

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-17 Thread Felix Schwarz
Jason King schrieb: > On another note, what packages are required to install and run the > bacula client. The RPM requires some dependencies but it is requiring > some .so.# files and I don't know what package those libraries would be > under. I suggest using yum or something similar and put th

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is why asking good questions are important. You do not have a /lib/libacl.so.1 because you likely have a /lib64/libacl.so.1 -- you are no doubt using 32-bit Bacula RPM's that rely on libraries you won't have. I see that on my 64-bit system I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Jason King
Yes, x86_64 indeed. Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Wait a second... is this machine x86_64 by any chance (notice you also > did not include that in your original question)? > > Jason King wrote: > >> Alright I'm out of ideas. I don't know how to in

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wait a second... is this machine x86_64 by any chance (notice you also did not include that in your original question)? Jason King wrote: > Alright I'm out of ideas. I don't know how to install the libraries this > thing needs. I've tried copying to

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Jason King
Alright I'm out of ideas. I don't know how to install the libraries this thing needs. I've tried copying to every director the strace says it looking for and I'm still not working. On the GOOD news...I'm not getting a Seg Fault anymore. Now it says "bacula-fd: error while loading shared librarie

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wouldn't personally do either one of those things (though they are one answer). You really need to know where those files are supposed to be and install those packages from that version of RHEL. All that stuff is definitely available if bacula is to

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Per Andreas Buer
Hi. I would recommend that you install from source unless you have the required libraries installed for bacula - do not use --nodeps unless you know exactly what you are doing. Or you might compare the machine you've got working with this one. Per. Jason King wrote: > On another note, what p

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Jason King
On another note, what packages are required to install and run the bacula client. The RPM requires some dependencies but it is requiring some .so.# files and I don't know what package those libraries would be under. I've tried up2date -i bacula-client and it isn't available. Tried the RPM and i

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-16 Thread Jason King
Ok, here you go: Jason Aaron Knister wrote: Try this- strace bacula-fd -f -d 500 2>&1 | tee log.out Then post log.out -Aaron Jason King wrote: Here is the output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# bacula-fd -f -d 500 Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Not very helpful huh? Jason Per Andreas

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-15 Thread Aaron Knister
Try this- strace bacula-fd -f -d 500 2>&1 | tee log.out Then post log.out -Aaron Jason King wrote: > Here is the output: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# bacula-fd -f -d 500 > Segmentation fault > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > > Not very helpful huh? > > Jason > > Per Andreas Buer wrote: > >> Jason King

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-15 Thread Jason King
Here is the output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# bacula-fd -f -d 500 Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Not very helpful huh? Jason Per Andreas Buer wrote: > Jason King wrote: >> I'm trying to run the bacula-client on my RHEL box. I have it running >> correctly on another RHEL box but on anothe

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-15 Thread Per Andreas Buer
Jason King wrote: > I'm trying to run the bacula-client on my RHEL box. I have it running > correctly on another RHEL box but on another one it doesn't work. When I > try and start the FD I get a simple message "Segmentation Fault". Could you start it with "bacula-fd -f -d 500" and post the outp

Re: [Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-15 Thread Per Andreas Buer
Jason King wrote: > I'm trying to run the bacula-client on my RHEL box. I have it running > correctly on another RHEL box but on another one it doesn't work. When I > try and start the FD I get a simple message "Segmentation Fault". Could you start it with "bacula-fd -f -d 500" and post the outp

[Bacula-users] Segmentation Fault on RHEL4

2007-02-14 Thread Jason King
I'm trying to run the bacula-client on my RHEL box. I have it running correctly on another RHEL box but on another one it doesn't work. When I try and start the FD I get a simple message "Segmentation Fault". The system logs say the same thing "Segmentation Fault". There are no other clued that