Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Josh Fisher
On 5/30/2012 2:17 PM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: Hello Josh. Have you tried restricting the number of concurrent jobs in the device definition in bacula-sd, as opposed to elsewhere? for example: Yes, it already is set to only 1 concurrent Job in bacula-sd.conf, but the problem is that

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello Josh. Have you tried restricting the number of concurrent jobs in the device > definition in bacula-sd, as opposed to elsewhere? for example: > Yes, it already is set to only 1 concurrent Job in bacula-sd.conf, but the problem is that, in my SD server, I have multiple IP address on multiple

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Josh Fisher
On 5/29/2012 9:40 PM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: > I have considered it, but I'll keep this idea as a last resort thing, > cause I'd have to migrate all my current backups to these new Pools > (so I wouldn't loose over a year of backups), and the config would be > very complicated to maintain..

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello Rodrigo, 2012/5/30 Rodrigo Renie Braga > > Define Full Pool (and other pools) directive in Job resource not a >> Schedule. >> >> > Hello Radosław. > > Bacula does use the correct Pool when upgrading a Incremental to Full, > i.e, instead of using the pool.inc Pool, when the Job is upgrades,

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
> Define Full Pool (and other pools) directive in Job resource not a > Schedule. > > Hello Radosław. Bacula does use the correct Pool when upgrading a Incremental to Full, i.e, instead of using the pool.inc Pool, when the Job is upgrades, is starts using the pool.full Pool. My problem is that eac

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-30 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2012/5/30 Rodrigo Renie Braga > > Run = Level=Incremental Pool=pool.inc FullPool=pool.full feb-jun on 1st > sat at 23:00 > > The FullPool parameter is very important, because if a Job is ran by this > Schedule and a Full backup has never been done before, Bacula will upgrade > this Job to

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-29 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
I have considered it, but I'll keep this idea as a last resort thing, cause I'd have to migrate all my current backups to these new Pools (so I wouldn't loose over a year of backups), and the config would be very complicated to maintain... I'll keep trying to find a good solution, but the more I d

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-29 Thread Bryan Harris
I think I see what you mean, sorry it didn't work. Can you possibly create a bunch of pool resources, one per job? Job { Name = backup1 Pool = backup1 ... } Then in the pool resource definitions, Pool { Name = backup1 Storage = backup1 ... } Then storage, Storage { Name = backup1

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-29 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello everyone... Bryan, that was a very good idea, but did not solved entirely... The thing is, in my SD server, I have one Device for Incremental and another for Diff/Full backup. In my Schedule resource, I have this: Run = Level=Incremental Pool=pool.inc FullPool=pool.full feb-jun on 1st sat a

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-28 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
2012/5/28 Alan Brown > > > I have a similar problem. Setting the non-FQDn IPs required in /etc/hosts > does the trick. > > I though about that at first too, but like I said, there are some VLANs that I have no control of, and also depending on local static configuration of 300+ servers can start t

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-28 Thread Alan Brown
On 28/05/12 05:28, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: > My ideal solution which Bacula, apparently, DOES NOT SUPPORT: make the > "Address" option on the Storage resource optional, meaning that if not > specified, the SD Address that Bacula will send to the FD is the same one > that the Director used to co

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-27 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Bryan, that ideia is just BRILLIANT It worked like a charm... With only one note: I was using the "storage" option inside the Pool resource (not in the Job), and apparently the Pool resource overrides any other resources, so I just had to remove this option from the Pool to add it to the Job r

Re: [Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-27 Thread Bryan Harris
Hello, On May 27, 2012, at 11:28 PM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: > My ideal solution which Bacula, apparently, DOES NOT SUPPORT: make the > "Address" option on the Storage resource optional, meaning that if not > specified, the SD Address that Bacula will send to the FD is the same one > that t

[Bacula-users] Same Bacula SD on Multiple Networks (VLANs)

2012-05-27 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello list. I need to backup several machines from different networks (VLANs), so to facilitate, I just plugged several network interfaces on my SD and Director server (both are on the same machine), with each interface on a different network with it's own IP address. That is great, because now my