>
> Are you able to do a Bacula tree restore with 6 million files?
>
I needed to split my backups into several jobs, because the bacula-dir
consumed more than 2 gig of RAM,
my largest backup now, is 4,487,947 files, and bacula-dir consumes 1156M
of RAM alone, and you need some RAM for backul
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Well, it really should not have much trouble backing them up or restoring
>>> them, though the restore may be a bit slower when creating so many files
>>> in one directory -- this is really OS and memory size dependent.
>>
>> It's the restore tree build
On Thursday 15 June 2006 18:52, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> Kern, how well does bacula cope with directories that have 300,000+
> >> files in them? (no, not being humourous)
> >
> > Well, it really should not have much trouble backing them up or restoring
> > t
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Kern, how well does bacula cope with directories that have 300,000+ files
>> in them? (no, not being humourous)
>
> Well, it really should not have much trouble backing them up or restoring
> them, though the restore may be a bit slower when creating so
On Thursday 15 June 2006 11:42, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Kel Raywood wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >> ... It is now necessary to be a rocket scientist before even
> >> considering using the GNU C++ compiler :-(
> >
> > Rocket scientists are notoriously bad p
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Kel Raywood wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> ... It is now necessary to be a rocket scientist before even
>> considering using the GNU C++ compiler :-(
>
> Rocket scientists are notoriously bad programmers so I don't think that
> this is some to aspire to.
Kel Raywood wrote:
> I think that the phrase "well, it's not rocket-science" should be
> replaced with "well, it's not M theory". To the question, "What's M
> theory?" an appropriate response is "Exactly !".
Or "Bloody confusing".
My favourite physics quip is probably still "nobody understand
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> ... It is now necessary to be a rocket scientist before even
> considering using the GNU C++ compiler :-(
Rocket scientists are notoriously bad programmers so I don't think that
this is some to aspire to. They crashed a Mars polar-lander because
they
