Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 16:50, Dan Langille wrote: > On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:36, John Kodis wrote: > > There's a brief review of Bacula at: > > > > http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula > > > > It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as > > being "far from intuitive

Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Dan Langille
On 5 Apr 2006 at 10:36, John Kodis wrote: > There's a brief review of Bacula at: > > http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula > > It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as > being "far from intuitive". Any publicity is good publicity. :) Tape changing is NOT di

Re: [Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread Mike Reinehr
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 09:36 am, John Kodis wrote: > There's a brief review of Bacula at: > > http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula > > It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as > being "far from intuitive". No argument there. In the short time that I

[Bacula-users] Review of Bacula

2006-04-05 Thread John Kodis
There's a brief review of Bacula at: http://osreviews.net/reviews/admin/bacula It's fairly positive, but criticizes the tape selection algorithm as being "far from intuitive". -- John Kodis. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a g