[Bacula-users] Restore problem using several Storages

2012-12-07 Thread ccspro
If you want to use FQDN's in Bacula and do not want to touch your DNS servers you could modify /etc/hosts (assuming you are on a *nix box) to do the job for you. The only gotcha is the remote host changes identity (repurposed, whatever) I use /etc/hosts to avoid DNS look ups, changes are immedi

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using several Storages

2012-12-07 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
2012/12/7 Silas Moeckel > try just 2 a records now views. > > But with 2 A records, sometimes the dns would resolve to 192.168.0.254 and others to 192.168.1.254. right? I used views because the "dmz" lan only have direct access to "192.168.0.254" and the DNS would always resolv to 192.168.0.254

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using several Storages

2012-12-07 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
> So only one real storage device? Try assigning a single dns name and > using that most modern resolvers when presented with more than one A record > will use one on a shared subnet before others. > > Yeah, I've tried that before, using views... But that created such a mess on my DNS server (spe

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using several Storages

2012-12-07 Thread Silas Moeckel
On 12/7/2012 11:56 AM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote: Hello list. I have several Storages configured but all of them are pointing to the same Device, they differ only by their Address. It's something like this: Storage { Name = st.servers Address = 192.168.1.254 Password = "XXX" D

[Bacula-users] Restore problem using several Storages

2012-12-07 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello list. I have several Storages configured but all of them are pointing to the same Device, they differ only by their Address. It's something like this: Storage { Name = st.servers Address = 192.168.1.254 Password = "XXX" Device = dev.tpc Media Type = LTO4 Autochanger