> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:45:01 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
>
> Am 25.07.19 um 11:45 schrieb Martin Simmons:
> >> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:55:10 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
> >>
> >> Am 23.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb Martin Simmons:
> >>> bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0
> >>
> >> Hi Martin.
> >>
> >> To
Am 25.07.19 um 21:47 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
>
> On 7/25/19 7:45 PM, Kai Gallasch wrote:
>> Would it be beneficial for understandind the problem if I set up a dummy
>> FreeBSD Backupclient (minimal install, bacula backup-client) do a full
>> backup on a empty tape and failing restore ("file count m
On 7/25/19 7:45 PM, Kai Gallasch wrote:
Am 25.07.19 um 11:45 schrieb Martin Simmons:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:55:10 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
Am 23.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb Martin Simmons:
bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0
Hi Martin.
To debug this I recreated the bacula postgres database, labeled t
Am 25.07.19 um 11:45 schrieb Martin Simmons:
>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:55:10 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
>>
>> Am 23.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb Martin Simmons:
>>> bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0
>>
>> Hi Martin.
>>
>> To debug this I recreated the bacula postgres database, labeled the
>> volume T001
Hi Kern,
This is somewhat surprising to me, assuming you mean a symlink - I can mark
and restore symlinks without any problems.
Moreover, a symlink might be relative and point to a different filesystem, so
if you restore it to a temporary directory then the target will never exist.
__Martin
>>
Hello,
Your problem is probably due to the fact that resolv.conf is a link
rather than a file. If this is the case (as it is on my machine) trying
to restore only the link without restoring the actual file, may confuse
Bacula. I would recommend you restore a few other files from the /etc
di
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:55:10 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
>
> Am 23.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb Martin Simmons:
> > bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0
>
> Hi Martin.
>
> To debug this I recreated the bacula postgres database, labeled the
> volume T00111L4 and did a full backup of the client ns.free.de w
Am 23.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb Martin Simmons:
> bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0
Hi Martin.
To debug this I recreated the bacula postgres database, labeled the
volume T00111L4 and did a full backup of the client ns.free.de which was
successful. After this I tried a restore of /etc/resolv.conf which
fa
I would start by using "bls -v -V T00109L4 /dev/nsa0" (the command line
utility) to see what is on the T00109L4 tape.
Can you repeat it with a small backup to a tape that contains nothing else?
__Martin
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:37:46 +0200, Kai Gallasch said:
>
> Hi.
>
> For long years I
Hi.
For long years I have been running Bacula Server on FreeBSD connected to
a 60 Slot tape library. Some weeks ago I noticed that restoring was not
possible any more. Backup jobs run successfully, but the restore fails
with "Restore OK", but no files restored.
This is really dangerous for users
Dear bacula-users,
I am using bacula 7.2.0
I am trying to restore some data. the restore fails with
13-Feb 15:26 bacula-sd JobId 845497: Ready to read from volume "File-2039" on
file device "FileStorage0" (/storageB/changer/drive0).
13-Feb 15:26 bacula-sd JobId 845497: Forward spacing Volume "
On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:57 AM, fsbren...@online.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've set up disk-based backups. The backups themselves seem to be running ok,
> but restore fails with:
>
>
> 11-Jul 16:45 mission-control-dir JobId 108: Error: Bacula backuphost-dir
> 5.0.1 (24Feb10): 11-Jul-2011 16:45:31
Hello,
I've set up disk-based backups. The backups themselves seem to be running ok,
but restore fails with:
11-Jul 16:45 mission-control-dir JobId 108: Error: Bacula backuphost-dir 5.0.1
(24Feb10): 11-Jul-2011 16:45:31
Build OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 10.04
JobId:
Hello!
I have the follwing Setup:
- Box1/FD: OTRS Server
- Box2/DIR: Directory Server
- Box3/SD: SD/NAS
Now i would like to test a Restore of my OTRS Server on a extra Box
(Box 4). So i bott this up with Ubuntu 10.10 64Bit and install
bacula-client with apt-get and try to run a restore. I get thi
Hi
I am attempting to restore a backup for which the files have exceeded the
retention period and therefore I need to restore the whole backup in order
to extract the files I want.
This is fine, except that the restore job keeps failing after it has
restored 23.0 GB out of a total of 68.0 GB.
hmmm ...
ok, working with backups on my new T50/LTO4 box. i've got some data backed up
but
when i tried to restore a file today i got this in the console:
07-Dec 11:44 molbio-dir JobId 6: Bacula molbio-dir 2.2.6 (10Nov07): 07-Dec-2007
11:44:31
otstrap records written to /bacula/bin/working/molb
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Richard Ryder wrote:
I recently tried to initiate a restore for someone who couldn't recall
the exact name of the files and directories they were interested in
restoring.
I had thisd happen not long ago.
The file server in question has a 2TB file system of which about 1T
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:32, Richard Ryder wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently tried to initiate a restore for someone who couldn't recall
> the exact name of the files and directories they were interested in
> restoring.
>
> The file server in question has a 2TB file system of which about 1TB is
>
Hi All,
I recently tried to initiate a restore for someone who couldn't recall
the exact name of the files and directories they were interested in
restoring.
The file server in question has a 2TB file system of which about 1TB is
full. There are a -lot- (in the millions) of tiny files on it.
19 matches
Mail list logo
