> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:13:30 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
>
> Em 06-02-2012 14:12, Martin Simmons escreveu:
> >> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe< 5.2.5) Volume
> >> Retention It looks bacula is rec
Em 06-02-2012 14:12, Martin Simmons escreveu:
>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe< 5.2.5) Volume
>> Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
>> even before volume retention period e
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:51 -0300, Diego Rubert said:
>
> Hello!
>
> I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe < 5.2.5) Volume
> Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
> even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
> all jobs
Em 03-02-2012 20:35, John Drescher escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Diego Rubert wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe< 5.2.5) Volume
>> Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
>> even before volume retention period expires..
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Diego Rubert wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe < 5.2.5) Volume
> Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
> even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
> all jobs and files from
Hello!
I've some problems with bacula 5.2.5 (maybe < 5.2.5) Volume
Retention It looks bacula is recycling volumes when no one is left,
even before volume retention period expires Although bacula purged
all jobs and files from volume, it should respect volume retention,
don't it?
For t
