Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-14 Thread Pierre Dibon
Le Vendredi 14 Avril 2006 09:12, Kern Sibbald a écrit : > On Friday 07 April 2006 16:06, pierre dibon wrote: > > Hello. > > New bacula user asking one question after reading pages of docs and > > mailing list archives. > > > > > > Got a question about 1.38.6 recycle algorithm : > > here is my prob

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 07 April 2006 16:06, pierre dibon wrote: > Hello. > New bacula user asking one question after reading pages of docs and mailing > list archives. > > > Got a question about 1.38.6 recycle algorithm : > here is my problem: > > On the pdf doc of the release 1.38.5 it's said that the recycle

[Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-13 Thread pierre dibon
Hello. New bacula user asking one question after reading pages of docs and mailing list archives. Got a question about 1.38.6 recycle algorithm : here is my problem: On the pdf doc of the release 1.38.5 it's said that the recycle algo uses tapes from the scratch pool AFTER checking for any r

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-09 Thread Pierre Dibon
Le Vendredi 7 Avril 2006 22:57, Ludovic Strappazon a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm still running 1.38.5, and I agree with Pierre, I think the use of > the scratch pool was at the right place in 1.38.5. > The last mail I read about the place of scratch pool in the recycling > algorithm was this one : > t

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Hello, I'm still running 1.38.5, and I agree with Pierre, I think the use of the scratch pool was at the right place in 1.38.5. The last mail I read about the place of scratch pool in the recycling algorithm was this one : Ludovic. Kern Sibbald a écrit : > >On Monday 28 November 2005 12:26,

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread Dibon Pierre
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > I think you should discuss this with the users who requested this feature. It > was openly discussed on this list some time ago, and had what seemed to me to > be rather unanimous agreement. >thank you, I'll try to find this thread in order to unde

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 07 April 2006 20:37, Dibon Pierre wrote: > Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > There was indeed a change in 1.38.x (perhaps as you say 1.38.6).  > > However, it > > > applies only if the InChanger flag is set in the Media record, > > which means > > > that in p

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread Dibon Pierre
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hello, > > There was indeed a change in 1.38.x (perhaps as you say 1.38.6).  However, it > applies only if the InChanger flag is set in the Media record, which means > that in principle we are dealing with an Autochanger, and in that case, I > believ

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, There was indeed a change in 1.38.x (perhaps as you say 1.38.6). However, it applies only if the InChanger flag is set in the Media record, which means that in principle we are dealing with an Autochanger, and in that case, I believe that the behavior is correct. There is no way to dis

[Bacula-users] Recycling and scratch pool

2006-04-07 Thread pd
Hello. New bacula user asking one question after reading pages of docs and mailing list archives. Got a question about 1.38.6 recycle algorithm : here is my problem: On the pdf doc of the release 1.38.5 it's said that the recycle algo uses tapes from the scratch pool AFTER checking for any r