Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-31 Thread Bob Hetzel
You may want to upgrade bacula to 5.0.1. One change I've noticed is that prior versions didn't purge/recycle tapes not found in the autochanger, which as a consequence didn't add them back into the Scratch pool. > Hi, > Yes, that's exactly the feature i need. I'll put it in as a feature > req

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread Dermot Beirne
Hi, Yes, that's exactly the feature i need. I'll put it in as a feature request, and I think i'll do some manual purges maybe monthly for anything over it's retention cycle period. Thank you. Dermot. On 30 March 2010 16:03, John Drescher wrote: > > I must be missing something here. Every day

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread John Drescher
> I must be missing something here. Every day we take out the tape that was > used the night before, and put it in a safe (in case the comms rooms is ever > inaccessible).  We then look for a tape from the scratch pool to put into > the empty slot.  This is fine, except that the scratch pool is not

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread Dermot Beirne
Hi, I must be missing something here. Every day we take out the tape that was used the night before, and put it in a safe (in case the comms rooms is ever inaccessible). We then look for a tape from the scratch pool to put into the empty slot. This is fine, except that the scratch pool is not bei

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread John Drescher
> Anyway, if anyone has already written such a script that i can adapt/use, > I'd be grateful, particularly something that can determine the retention > periods, etc.   It would not be my strong point. > Thank you. I will try to find you links if I get time. Externally handling of retention period

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread John Drescher
> Thanks for replying, I was afraid you might say something like that! > It does seem strange that such scripting would be necessary, as anyone with > an autoloader must have a similar dilemma. I have an 2 drive 24 slot autoloader. I definitely do not have this problem. I change tapes probably 1 t

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread Dermot Beirne
Hi, Thanks for replying, I was afraid you might say something like that! It does seem strange that such scripting would be necessary, as anyone with an autoloader must have a similar dilemma. I guess it's one for the wishlist. Anyway, if anyone has already written such a script that i can adapt/us

Re: [Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-30 Thread John Drescher
> My understanding is that the volumes will never be used/pruned/purged > as long as a suitable tape can be found. That is correct. >  If this is correct, then > only when there is no suitable tape in the autoloader, will Bacula > start purging these volumes back to Scratch. I believe so. > It

[Bacula-users] Recycle Pool and autoloaders

2010-03-18 Thread Dermot Beirne
Hi, I am using Bacula 3.0.2 on Ubuntu 9.04. I use disk staging backups, first to disk, and then on to tape. The only part i seem to be having a problem with is the recyclepool. It is set to Scratch, but volumes are never moved there, even if status is recycle, full, or used. The technicians remo