-- Forwarded message --From: Bart Schelstraete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Mar 31, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Re: software compressionTo: Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>This is the complete output of ldd:
libacl.so.1 => /lib64/libacl.so.1 (0x003d1ec0)
On 3/30/2006 10:43 PM, Bart Schelstraete wrote:
# ldd `which bacula-fd`
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x4002f000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40035000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x40047000)
# ldd `which bacula-fd` linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1 (0x4002f000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40035000) libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x40047000) librt.so.1 => /lib/tls/librt.so.1 (0x4004b000)
libpthread.s
Hi,
On 3/30/2006 9:55 PM, Bart Schelstraete wrote:
Is the file daemon bacula-fd on the clients compiled with compression
support?
We have 2 type of FD's:
- one on the bacula server itself, which is done with an src rpm
- on on a HP-UX box
Both have the same problem, and on both box
Is the file daemon bacula-fd on the clients compiled with compressionsupport?
We have 2 type of FD's:- one on the bacula server itself, which is done with an src rpm- on on a HP-UX boxBoth have the same problem, and on both boxes, the zlib is available.
Btw, can you specifiy the compression option
Hello,
On 3/30/2006 5:40 PM, Bart Schelstraete wrote:
Hi,
I just started with Bacula, and I have a small problem.
I'm running the latest Bacula version on Redhat ES 4.0, 64bit, and
this was built from the src rpm according to the bacula guidelines.
The bacula fileset confi
Hi,
I just started with Bacula, and I have a small problem.
I'm running the latest Bacula version on Redhat ES 4.0, 64bit, and this
was built from the src rpm according to the bacula guidelines.
The bacula fileset configuration says that it needs to use gzip compression:
--
Options {
sig
