Martin Simmons wrote:
> I suggest you run the restore command and read what options it gives
> you.
Sorry, I was to pessimistic when I read the options before. Your hint
to option 5 should have brought me on track.
Actually opition 6 is rigth choice to do almost everythink.
Thanks,
Mick
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:04:17 + (UTC), "Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mick> Martin Simmons wrote:
>> Bacula can analyse the catalog for you. Use restore option like "5:
>> Select the most recent backup for a client" which gives you an
>> interactive way to mark files and dirs (
Martin Simmons wrote:
> Bacula can analyse the catalog for you. Use restore option like "5:
> Select the most recent backup for a client" which gives you an
> interactive way to mark files and dirs (recursively by default) for
> restore.
Thanks, but I want to restore for an earlier point in time.
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:31:18 + (UTC), "Mick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mick> Martin Simmons wrote:
>> Bacula 1.37 beta has an extra option in restore to take a whole
>> directory (but not its subdirs for some reason).
>>
>> __Martin
Mick> I can't believe that a sophisticat
Martin Simmons wrote:
> Bacula 1.37 beta has an extra option in restore to take a whole
> directory (but not its subdirs for some reason).
>
> __Martin
I can't believe that a sophisticated backup application as Bacula is
not able to recover the state of a file system branch at the time of a
cert
