Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula & Multiple Tape Drives

2005-08-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 09:15, Daniel Holtkamp wrote: > Hi ! > > Now i`m on the list too, thanks for the nice explanation about the > atimes & tmpwatch ;) > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Yes, Bacula modifies atime for all files that it backs up. However, > > there is an option "keepatime = yes", w

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula & Multiple Tape Drives

2005-08-03 Thread Daniel Holtkamp
Hi ! Now i`m on the list too, thanks for the nice explanation about the atimes & tmpwatch ;) Kern Sibbald wrote: Yes, Bacula modifies atime for all files that it backs up. However, there is an option "keepatime = yes", which will cause Bacula to reset the atime on files that it backs up. H

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula & Multiple Tape Drives

2005-08-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 01 August 2005 20:58, Mark Bober wrote: > > > Amanda changes the access-times on all the files it backups but this > > > collides with out tmpwatch system - the files never expire :-( I hope > > > this behavior is different with bacula. > > > > Bacula uses access times to decide what file

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Bacula & Multiple Tape Drives

2005-08-01 Thread Mark Bober
> > > > Amanda changes the access-times on all the files it backups but this > > collides with out tmpwatch system - the files never expire :-( I hope > > this behavior is different with bacula. > > Bacula uses access times to decide what files to backup on Incremental and > Differential backups.

[Bacula-users] Re: Bacula & Multiple Tape Drives

2005-07-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 29 July 2005 11:03, Daniel Holtkamp wrote: > Hello ! > > Firstoff excuse me for contacting you directly but from reading the > mailinglist-archives i was getting the impression that this might be the > easiest way to get the information i am trying to collect :-) > > At the moment we are