Re: [Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update slots" bugfix

2006-01-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
gt; Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:37 AM > > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: Alexander Kuehn; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update > > slots" bugfix > > > > > > Thanks for the ou

RE: [Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update slots" bugfix

2006-01-09 Thread Alexander Kuehn
rn Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:37 AM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Alexander Kuehn; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update > slots" bugfix > > > Thanks for t

Re: [Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update slots" bugfix

2006-01-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
Thanks for the output. It is interesting to see how chio actually works. However, I don't understand the need for a call to bc since "wc -l' at least on my system returns a perfectly valid count (in fact the same thing as "wc -l | bc". On Monday 09 January 2006 10:55, Alexander Kuehn wrote: >

[Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update slots" bugfix

2006-01-09 Thread Alexander Kuehn
Sure, ~ > chio -f /dev/ch0 status slot slot 0: slot 1: slot 2: slot 3: slot 4: slot 5: ~ > chio -f /dev/ch0 status slot|wc -l 6 ~ > Kind regards, Alex. > -Original Message- > From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:20 PM > To: [EMAIL

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] autochanger "update slots" bugfix

2006-01-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
I've added your fix to the source, but in looking at the line, it seems to me that it is not going to handle things correctly. Could you send me the raw output from: ${MTX} -f $CHANGER status slot Thanks. On Thursday 05 January 2006 18:58, Alexander Kuehn wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded f