> Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I
> suggest changing the acronym from RFC to something else to
> avoid conflict and possible confusion with RFC = "Request for
> Comment", used extensively to document Internet and other standards.
>
> What about RFF = "Request for Featur
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:58, Karl Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Kern --
>
> Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing
> the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible
> confusion with RFC = "Request for Comment", used extensively to document
>
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:58, Karl Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Kern --
>
> Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing
> the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible
> confusion with RFC = "Request for Comment", used extensively to document
>
Hi Kern --
Sounds like a great plan. It's probably too late but I suggest changing
the acronym from RFC to something else to avoid conflict and possible
confusion with RFC = "Request for Comment", used extensively to document
Internet and other standards.
What about RFF = "Request for Featu
