Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-05 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, the same question/answer were exactly in the mail before, please read the README.Fedora file in bacula-common. There are notes regarding this matter and a quick installation guide. Remember to update the database as well as in 5.2.3 it is different. --Simone 2012/1/5 mayak-cq > ** > O

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-05 Thread mayak-cq
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:31 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest changes > from rawhide. > > Apart from small tweaks and updates I do _NOT_ plan to make any > additional change to the repository in the immediate future; so this >

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread Simone Caronni
btw, if after the upgrade the command "update-alternatives --display libbaccats-5.2.3.so" returns nothing, please reinstall bacula-libs with "yum -y reinstall bacula-libs". I also added Fedora 15 as it has been requested by few people. Now the process of updating the repository is automated, so I

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread Simone Caronni
Now fixed for all distributions. Thanks, --Simone On 4 January 2012 17:28, Josh Fisher wrote: > yum update returns "Package bacula-client-5.2.3-5.el6.x86_64.rpm is not > signed". > > > On 1/4/2012 11:07 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: > > Hello, > > the RHEL 6 packages are in place, maybe it was st

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread Josh Fisher
yum update returns "Package bacula-client-5.2.3-5.el6.x86_64.rpm is not signed". On 1/4/2012 11:07 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, the RHEL 6 packages are in place, maybe it was still uploading when you checked. Regards, --Simone On 4 January 2012 16:44, mayak-cq

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, the RHEL 6 packages are in place, maybe it was still uploading when you checked. Regards, --Simone On 4 January 2012 16:44, mayak-cq wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:31 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest change

Re: [Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread mayak-cq
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:31 +0100, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest changes > from rawhide. > > Apart from small tweaks and updates I do _NOT_ plan to make any > additional change to the repository in the immediate future; so this >

[Bacula-users] RHEL 4/5/6 - Fedora 16 Bacula RPM repository

2012-01-04 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, I'm in the process of updating the repository with the latest changes from rawhide. Apart from small tweaks and updates I do _NOT_ plan to make any additional change to the repository in the immediate future; so this could be a safe upgrade for Enterprise distributions. The repository is