Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 15:17, Russell Howe wrote: > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > If I see that users just cannot "get" or tolerate Python scripting, then > > falling back to Phil's suggestion would be a solution. > > I'm sure it must be fairly easy to write a short python script to > perform actio

Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Russell Howe
Kern Sibbald wrote: > If I see that users just cannot "get" or tolerate Python scripting, then > falling back to Phil's suggestion would be a solution. I'm sure it must be fairly easy to write a short python script to perform actions in a way which doesn't require python knowledge. -- Russell H

Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 14:16, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 26.10.2005 13:41, Marek Simon wrote: > > I have a feature request for next version > > There are Client Before and After commands, its usage is obvious. But > > when the backup fails (not enough space etc), the After command wi

Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 26.10.2005 13:41, Marek Simon wrote: I have a feature request for next version There are Client Before and After commands, its usage is obvious. But when the backup fails (not enough space etc), the After command will not run and the client dont know, the backup is (even unsuccesful

Re: [Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 13:41, Marek Simon wrote: > I have a feature request for next version > There are Client Before and After commands, its usage is obvious. But > when the backup fails (not enough space etc), the After command will not > run and the client dont know, the backup is (even u

[Bacula-users] RFC: client after fail command

2005-10-26 Thread Marek Simon
I have a feature request for next version There are Client Before and After commands, its usage is obvious. But when the backup fails (not enough space etc), the After command will not run and the client dont know, the backup is (even unsuccesfully) finished. So I would like to have another par