[Bacula-users] RE: Re: [Bacula-users] backup errors

2005-04-08 Thread Jens R . Victorin
Another thing to try is to add a separate exclude block to the fileset. /Jens > So nobody knows what does it mean? > > 08-Apr 11:08 backup-dir: Start Backup JobId 341, Job=poh.2005-04-08_11.08.34 > 08-Apr 11:08 backup-dir: poh.2005-04-08_11.08.34 Fatal error: FD gave bad > response to Include

[Bacula-users] RE: Re: [Bacula-users] backup errors

2005-04-08 Thread Jens R . Victorin
What happens if you replace the "@" with a "<" ? /Jens > So nobody knows what does it mean? > > 08-Apr 11:08 backup-dir: Start Backup JobId 341, Job=poh.2005-04-08_11.08.34 > 08-Apr 11:08 backup-dir: poh.2005-04-08_11.08.34 Fatal error: FD gave bad > response to Include command: wanted 2000 O

[Bacula-users] RE: Re: [Bacula-users] backup errors

2005-04-08 Thread Jens R . Victorin
What's working and what's not? Can you see any pattern (backuplevel, OS etc) It might be compatibility issues between 1.36.2 and 1.34.2. /Jens > On server side is 1.36.2 > > On client side machines are Solaris, FreeBSD and Linux with following > versions: 1.36.2 and 1.34.2 > > Incremintal j