Re: [Bacula-users] Question regarding Volume rotation

2013-02-03 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 3, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Nasos Nikologiannis wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> >> On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Nasos Nikologiannis wrote: >> >> > I have a Bacula test setup running in order to decide about volume >> > rotation before migrating to production. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Question regarding Volume rotation

2013-02-03 Thread Nasos Nikologiannis
Thank you for your answer, I thought that Bacula automatically updates the pool definition since director is restarted. Regarding my second question, is the Maximum Volumes directive needed although the volume rotation is set by Volume Retention? On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Question regarding Volume rotation

2013-02-03 Thread Dan Langille
On Feb 3, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Nasos Nikologiannis wrote: > I have a Bacula test setup running in order to decide about volume rotation > before migrating to production. > > The setup includes multi pools with volume rotation, one pool per client per > backup type (full, differential, incremental

[Bacula-users] Question regarding Volume rotation

2013-02-03 Thread Nasos Nikologiannis
I have a Bacula test setup running in order to decide about volume rotation before migrating to production. The setup includes multi pools with volume rotation, one pool per client per backup type (full, differential, incremental). I observed that although I change the Volume Retention period to