Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Replying to myself! I have now seen that this conclusion is wrong. I
> haven't been testing Bacula for quite some time and yet the tape error
> has again shown its ugly face. Perhaps it's a hardware problem? Anyway,
> I apologise for having accused Bacula for this problem and
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 11:28 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:06, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > > How does Bacula handle "foreign" tapes? I am currently using Amanda for
> > > back-up but planning to switch to Bacula an
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:56 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:06, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > How does Bacula handle "foreign" tapes? I am currently using Amanda for
> > back-up but planning to switch to Bacula and sometimes I erroneously
> > leave an Amanda labeled tape in th
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:06, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> How does Bacula handle "foreign" tapes? I am currently using Amanda for
> back-up but planning to switch to Bacula and sometimes I erroneously
> leave an Amanda labeled tape in the tape drive. I see the error when
> Bacula complains about the
Erik P. Olsen wrote:
How does Bacula handle "foreign" tapes? I am currently using Amanda for
back-up but planning to switch to Bacula and sometimes I erroneously
leave an Amanda labeled tape in the tape drive. I see the error when
Bacula complains about the tape and pull it out, but later when Am
How does Bacula handle "foreign" tapes? I am currently using Amanda for
back-up but planning to switch to Bacula and sometimes I erroneously
leave an Amanda labeled tape in the tape drive. I see the error when
Bacula complains about the tape and pull it out, but later when Amanda
recycles the tape
