2009/3/12, Ralf Gross :
> I can't see anything obvious.
>
> Is the number of files in the job output of your first mail correct?
> Do the 70,966 match the number of files in the backup job report?
>
> Files Expected: 70,966
> Files Examined: 70,966
Yes, the numbers of the backup jo
Alex Bremer schrieb:
> 2009/3/12, Ralf Gross :
> > The verify is done in the fd, so I would addd the debug option there
> > too. And also to the sd, because if bacula complains about a file that
> > is missing on the volume, you might find the answer there.
>
> Yes, I did this, but at least the fd
2009/3/12, Ralf Gross :
> The verify is done in the fd, so I would addd the debug option there
> too. And also to the sd, because if bacula complains about a file that
> is missing on the volume, you might find the answer there.
Yes, I did this, but at least the fd logfile does not seem to contain
Alex Bremer schrieb:
> 2009/3/11, Ralf Gross :
> > So the volume only has 7 volume files (markers/chunks). You could add
> > -d 100 or 200 to the daemon options in the bacula-fd start script on
> > the client where the verify is running and redirect the output to a
> > file.
>
> Thanks for that ti
2009/3/11, Ralf Gross :
> So the volume only has 7 volume files (markers/chunks). You could add
> -d 100 or 200 to the daemon options in the bacula-fd start script on
> the client where the verify is running and redirect the output to a
> file.
Thanks for that tip. I added -d 100 to all of the sta
Alex Bremer schrieb:
> 2009/3/10, Ralf Gross :
> > Hm, no idea what the problem is. But file 7 is not a real backed up
> > file, it's some kind of mark that bacula writes to the volume.
> >
> > Can you check the volume with bscan?
>
> Yes, seems to work - I tried the '-r' option and bscan did not
2009/3/10, Ralf Gross :
> Hm, no idea what the problem is. But file 7 is not a real backed up
> file, it's some kind of mark that bacula writes to the volume.
>
> Can you check the volume with bscan?
Yes, seems to work - I tried the '-r' option and bscan did not complain:
#
bs
albre...@googlemail.com schrieb:
> 2009/3/9, Ralf Gross :
> > albre...@googlemail.com schrieb:
> >> Bacula always seems to think that the end of volume is reached:
> >> -
> >> 09-Mar 16:11 SD.xen JobId 3: End of Volume at file 7 on device
> >> "DEV.FileStorage" (/local/var/backu
2009/3/9, Ralf Gross :
> albre...@googlemail.com schrieb:
>> Bacula always seems to think that the end of volume is reached:
>> -
>> 09-Mar 16:11 SD.xen JobId 3: End of Volume at file 7 on device
>> "DEV.FileStorage" (/local/var/backup/volumes), Volume
>> "VOL-MANUAL-0001"
>> --
albre...@googlemail.com schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem with the VolumeToCatalog Verify of one of my backup
> jobs. I always get the error message that some files are in the
> Catalog but not on the volume. However this is not true - I can
> successfully restore files which are being report
Hello,
I have a problem with the VolumeToCatalog Verify of one of my backup
jobs. I always get the error message that some files are in the
Catalog but not on the volume. However this is not true - I can
successfully restore files which are being reported as missing.
I just reinitialized my whole
11 matches
Mail list logo
