Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Martin Simmons
You could build your own rpms using Simone's spec file. __Martin > On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:17:12 +0200, Can Şirin said: > > In fact, we would prefer to use only the official repositories of > RHEL, instead of third parties because of the security issues. > If it is not too hard to compile

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Can Şirin
In fact, we would prefer to use only the official repositories of RHEL, instead of third parties because of the security issues. If it is not too hard to compile a project that there is no rpm package in the off. repos, it is more preferable for us to compile it. We do not use unofficial repos,

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, OK, yes, it makes sense that the systemd directory code was probably implemented at the same time as the systemd files. Simone is going to give me some enhanced systemd files, and I will add an appropriate Makefile target for getting them installed. Thanks for bringing this up. Best rega

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Can Şirin
Quoting Kern Sibbald : > Hello, > > Yes, you are correct, currently there is no Makefile command to install > the systemd files. I like your idea of adding a new configure option. > I would probably prefer "with-systemd-dir=" which corresponds to how the > other directories work, then define a de

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
On 7 November 2014 10:43, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Yes, you are correct, currently there is no Makefile command to install > the systemd files. I like your idea of adding a new configure option. > I would probably prefer "with-systemd-dir=" which corresponds to how the > other directories work, the

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
Sorry, I forgot to reply to all. Mail re-attached: Hi Kern, On 7 November 2014 10:51, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Would it be worth while to include your enhanced systemd files in the > Bacula source release for those users who either want to build themselves > or who want a more advanced template?

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Simone, Would it be worth while to include your enhanced systemd files in the Bacula source release for those users who either want to build themselves or who want a more advanced template? If so, could you please send me your files?  I am a bit lazy

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Yes, you are correct, currently there is no Makefile command to install the systemd files. I like your idea of adding a new configure option. I would probably prefer "with-systemd-dir=" which corresponds to how the other directories work, then define a default and as you say just add a ne

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, I'm the maintainer of Bacula in Fedora and I've been providing repositories for both Bacula 5.x and Bacula 7.x. These are the repositories, based on rebuilt packages that are in Fedora rawhide: https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula7/ https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaa

[Bacula-users] Problem with installing bacula systemd unit files

2014-11-07 Thread Can Şirin
Hi, I am setting up a new backup server with Bacula 7.0.5 on RHEL7. I am going to compile it from the source code. Everything is fine but just systemd integration. In the configuration options, I use "--with-systemd=/usr/lib/systemd/system" After "make" command has been ended, I run the "make