On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:32 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:41 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:24 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> > > > I've been all through the documentation and I was sure I set up things
> > > > correctly.
> > > >
> > > > Server is CentO
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 14:20 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:41 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >>> OK - I replaced the 127.0.0.1 references (only in bacula-dir.conf) with
> >>> the fully qualified domain name that does resolve on both client and
> >>> serv
Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:41 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>>> OK - I replaced the 127.0.0.1 references (only in bacula-dir.conf) with
>>> the fully qualified domain name that does resolve on both client and
>>> server, restarted the bacula-dir daemon but that doesn't change the
>
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:41 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> > OK - I replaced the 127.0.0.1 references (only in bacula-dir.conf) with
> > the fully qualified domain name that does resolve on both client and
> > server, restarted the bacula-dir daemon but that doesn't change the
> > problem... in fact
> OK - I replaced the 127.0.0.1 references (only in bacula-dir.conf) with
> the fully qualified domain name that does resolve on both client and
> server, restarted the bacula-dir daemon but that doesn't change the
> problem... in fact, that is where I started but I went to the 127.0.0.1
> out of f
I've been all through the documentation and I was sure I set up things
correctly.
Server is CentOS-5 built 3.0.3
Client is Macintosh built 3.0.3
Server can telnet to client port 9102
Client can telnet to server port 9103
Server can back itself up and passes tests including autochanger.
I know f
