> Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from
> John appaers to contain the phrase "always = client", when his original
> post contained "always > = client".
>
> This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the
> line at "> =" and
> so the "> " was seen as bei
On 21/04/2011 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
[SNIP]
>>>
>> No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always =
>> client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.
>> John
> Hello,
>
> This rule is not the real trut
On 4/20/2011 3:26 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> This rule is not the real truth.
>> I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
>> Director (and Storage)
> That does not violate the rule I gave.
>
>> Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
>>
> Th
> This rule is not the real truth.
> I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
> Director (and Storage)
That does not violate the rule I gave.
> Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
>
This rule has been told to us from the developers cou
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
>> Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
>>> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
> Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
>> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
>>> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
>>> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
>>> ca
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
> Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
>> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
>> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
>> can't get bacula running.
>>
>> Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6,
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
> I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
> it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
> can't get bacula running.
>
> Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
> Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 a
Hallo bacula Mailinglist,
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.
Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
No SSL/TLS in use.
T
