On 7. apr. 2011, at 03.07, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
> I guess it would be nice to have priorities separated per Storage...
>
> 2011/4/6
> You are right that no priority 10 jobs will get run while there are higher
> priority (lower number) jobs running. To run jobs in parallel they need to
>
From: hymie! [mailto:hy...@lactose.homelinux.net]
> > Sent: 04 April 2011 15:26
> > To: bacula-users
> > Subject: [Bacula-users] Priority question
> >
> >
> > My bacula setup is improving, and I have you guys to thank for it, so
> > thank you.
> >
>
important ones at 5 minutes past
the hour and I believe they will maintain that order in the queue.
Cheers,
Ewan
> -Original Message-
> From: hymie! [mailto:hy...@lactose.homelinux.net]
> Sent: 04 April 2011 15:26
> To: bacula-users
> Subject: [Bacula-users] Priority ques
My bacula setup is improving, and I have you guys to thank for it, so
thank you.
I have two separate Storage resources, and each one has specific
backup jobs assigned to it, and (I think) two jobs will run at a time,
one to each Storage.
I have a handful of jobs, and they have a handful of prior
