Re: [Bacula-users] Pool spec in job resource

2022-05-04 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 5/4/22 08:39, Chris Wilkinson wrote: Thanks for that Bill. Now I understand why there is the option to specify the pools in the schedules  something I always thought unnecessary. I'm still puzzled why the pool clause is required in the job when the full etc is given. Is it just a parser qui

Re: [Bacula-users] Pool spec in job resource

2022-05-04 Thread Chris Wilkinson
Thanks for that Bill. Now I understand why there is the option to specify the pools in the schedules something I always thought unnecessary. I'm still puzzled why the pool clause is required in the job when the full etc is given. Is it just a parser quirk? Regards Chris Wilkinson On Wed, 4 May

Re: [Bacula-users] Pool spec in job resource

2022-05-03 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 5/3/22 15:46, Chris Wilkinson wrote: I wonder if someone with more extensive knowledge of Bacula could clarify the usage of 'pool=' and the optional 'full|differential|incremental backup pool=' directives in the job resource. The former is required I think whether or not the latter is given.

[Bacula-users] Pool spec in job resource

2022-05-03 Thread Chris Wilkinson
I wonder if someone with more extensive knowledge of Bacula could clarify the usage of 'pool=' and the optional 'full|differential|incremental backup pool=' directives in the job resource. The former is required I think whether or not the latter is given. Since the latter will override the former,