My one comment is that if you really want to keep this data forever,
then you should *really* be making multiple copies to tape, and then
also re-reading them and comparing them against the master data.
I also think that the biggest time sink will be the finding and
building of the daily tar fi
On 6/27/2015 1:37 AM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda
> wrote:
>> Are you going to generate a .tar of about 250TB every day? Which will
>> be the nature of your restores? You´re going to need always the
>> restore of the whole data set or occasional
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Ana Emília M. Arruda
wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After wrestling with a Dell TL4000 in the thread marked "Dell
>> TL4000 labeling timeout", it looks like the autochanger is going to be
>
Hello Andrew,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After wrestling with a Dell TL4000 in the thread marked "Dell
> TL4000 labeling timeout", it looks like the autochanger is going to be
> fine thanks to the efforts of several people, especially Ana, on this
>
Hi all,
After wrestling with a Dell TL4000 in the thread marked "Dell
TL4000 labeling timeout", it looks like the autochanger is going to be
fine thanks to the efforts of several people, especially Ana, on this
list.
Moving forward, I'm about to start running jobs to at first
backfill a
