On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:58 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4
> >It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1
>
> This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that
> the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should
Dont think so, there are
Hi,
>This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4
>It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1
This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that
the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should
I just upgrade to beta versions ? Using beta versions
is tempting, because I would like to us
Hi,
>What version of Bacula are you running? Which OS? What kind of hardware do
>you have? :)
Sorry, I forgot those: Bacula 2.4.4, FreeBSD 7.1, disks
are SATA disks and tape is HP DAT160.
Ari S.
--
This SF.net ema
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05:53AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My configuration is roughly like this: I back up
> about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and
> migrate the backups to tape once a week.
>
> Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on
> disk is currently about 25 Gb. I
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:05 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My configuration is roughly like this: I back up
> about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and
> migrate the backups to tape once a week.
>
> Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on
> disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have al
Hi,
My configuration is roughly like this: I back up
about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and
migrate the backups to tape once a week.
Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on
disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have also some
backups going directly to tape, performance there
is also ok.
