Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2012-10-01 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes : > Hi, when restoring, listing files, backing up, purging or pruning mysql > process uses 100% CPU and the machine is unusable, and such operations last > to long. Doing some research I found that this can be related to database > indexes, but I didn't understa

[Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2012-09-24 Thread Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes
Hi, when restoring, listing files, backing up, purging or pruning mysql process uses 100% CPU and the machine is unusable, and such operations last to long. Doing some research I found that this can be related to database indexes, but I didn't understanf well what I need to do .Here is the output

[Bacula-users] Performance issues after upgrade

2010-03-16 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, On a bacula installation that I originally set up on a machine running Debian "etch", everything was running smoothly. Since etch has been EOL'ed, it was necessary to upgrade it, and we recently did do an upgrade to lenny. This also involved an upgrade of bacula from 1.38 (the version in etch

Re: [Bacula-users] performance issues

2007-12-13 Thread Jeronimo Zucco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Cregan wrote: > Hi We have just started to use bacula as our backup solution and > are suffering some performance problems. The details are > > Server: Debian 4.0 running bacula 2.2.4 is multihomed as it backs > up over two networks. Storage is Ov

[Bacula-users] performance issues

2007-12-05 Thread Bob Cregan
Hi We have just started to use bacula as our backup solution and are suffering some performance problems. The details are Server: Debian 4.0 running bacula 2.2.4 is multihomed as it backs up over two networks. Storage is Overland Arcvault24 on same host Database is mysql: ceres:/usr/lo

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-26 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Kopecki wrote: More than enough, but you'll ensure postgres is actually using it. How big is its memory footprint? postgres 19292 /usr/bin/postmaster -D /var/lib/pgsql/data postgres 10088 postgres: stats buffer process postgres 9096 postgres: stats collector process

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-25 Thread Andreas Kopecki
Hi! On Monday 25 April 2005 12:34, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Kopecki wrote: > >>> Test-Server: Dual PIII 1GHz on a GRAU Tape Silo running Bacula > >>> Postgresql 1.36.2 spooling on a software Raid-0 2x80GB PATA Disks. > >> > >> How much ram? > > > > 2Gig, I think that should

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-25 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Kopecki wrote: Test-Server: Dual PIII 1GHz on a GRAU Tape Silo running Bacula Postgresql 1.36.2 spooling on a software Raid-0 2x80GB PATA Disks. How much ram? 2Gig, I think that should be sufficient? More than enough, but you'll ensure postgres is actually using it. How

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-25 Thread Andreas Kopecki
Hi! On Monday 25 April 2005 12:24, Alan Brown wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Kopecki wrote: > > Test-Server: Dual PIII 1GHz on a GRAU Tape Silo running Bacula Postgresql > > 1.36.2 spooling on a software Raid-0 2x80GB PATA Disks. > > How much ram? 2Gig, I think that should be sufficient?

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-25 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Kopecki wrote: Test-Server: Dual PIII 1GHz on a GRAU Tape Silo running Bacula Postgresql 1.36.2 spooling on a software Raid-0 2x80GB PATA Disks. How much ram? AB --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Rea

[Bacula-users] Performance Issues

2005-04-25 Thread Andreas Kopecki
Hi! I am currently evaluating Bacula for our on-site backup. All is running well, except I am stumbling over a few performance issues. Our setup is as follows: Test-Server: Dual PIII 1GHz on a GRAU Tape Silo running Bacula Postgresql 1.36.2 spooling on a software Raid-0 2x80GB PATA Disks. Test