Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
John Drescher wrote: >>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job? >>> >>> John >>> >>> >> Ahhh... Maybe. It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for >> testing. However this is in the dir.conf: >> >> >> > Recently I have seen users on this list having pro

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread John Drescher
>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job? >> >> John >> > > Ahhh...  Maybe.  It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for > testing.  However this is in the dir.conf: > > Recently I have seen users on this list having problems where emailing was causing this type of ha

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
John Drescher wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson > wrote: > >> John Drescher wrote: >> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished. The fileset for this te

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > John Drescher wrote: >>> >>> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes.  However I've >>> let >>> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished. >>> >>> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which total

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
John Drescher wrote: >> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let >> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished. >> >> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K. >> When I run the first backup that completes, it only

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Heitor Medrado de Faria
Drew Tomlinson wrote: > John Drescher wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson >> wrote: >> >> >>> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using >>> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all >>> running on this sam

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread John Drescher
> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes.  However I've let > jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished. > > The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K. >  When I run the first backup that completes, it only takes about 10 seconds > t

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
John Drescher wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson > wrote: > >> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using >> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all >> running on this same system. >> >> Bacula works fine for one b

Re: [Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using > its portage system.  The director, storage, and file daemons are all > running on this same system. > > Bacula works fine for one backup.  However any subsequent backu

[Bacula-users] One Backup OK - Others Hang

2010-02-02 Thread Drew Tomlinson
I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all running on this same system. Bacula works fine for one backup. However any subsequent backup "hangs". Stopping and restarting both the director and stor