John Drescher wrote:
>>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>> Ahhh... Maybe. It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for
>> testing. However this is in the dir.conf:
>>
>>
>>
> Recently I have seen users on this list having pro
>> Wait a minute. Are you sending emails after each job?
>>
>> John
>>
>
> Ahhh... Maybe. It's the default dir.conf that I only modified a little for
> testing. However this is in the dir.conf:
>
>
Recently I have seen users on this list having problems where emailing
was causing this type of ha
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson
> wrote:
>
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've
let
jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
The fileset for this te
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've
>>> let
>>> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>>>
>>> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which total
John Drescher wrote:
>> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let
>> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>>
>> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K.
>> When I run the first backup that completes, it only
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
>>> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
>>> running on this sam
> The particular instance has been running for 105 minutes. However I've let
> jobs run for over 8 hours and they still never finished.
>
> The fileset for this test backup is just /etc/bacula which totals about 18K.
> When I run the first backup that completes, it only takes about 10 seconds
> t
John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson
> wrote:
>
>> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
>> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
>> running on this same system.
>>
>> Bacula works fine for one b
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
> its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
> running on this same system.
>
> Bacula works fine for one backup. However any subsequent backu
I'm using bacula 3.0.3 that was compiled on a Gentoo distribution using
its portage system. The director, storage, and file daemons are all
running on this same system.
Bacula works fine for one backup. However any subsequent backup
"hangs". Stopping and restarting both the director and stor
10 matches
Mail list logo