Hello,
> >
> > One of your ioctl() calls seems to be broken or always returning
> > a bad status.
> >
> > Try using the btape in the trunk of the SVN. It has a number
> > of little fixes that could clarify your problem. If you don't
> > know how
> wait until 2.1.8 is released in BETA later this week.
>
>
> >Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 09:30:56 +0200
> >From: "Mariusz Czulada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: [Bacula-users] Odp: Another problem with TS3310
> >To: "bacula-users"
> &g
.8 is released in BETA later this
week.
>Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 09:30:56 +0200
>From: "Mariusz Czulada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Bacula-users] Odp: Another problem with TS3310
>To: "bacula-users"
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Typ
Hi again,
I tried one more thing with btape, and this is the result:
==
*rewind
btape: btape.c:469 Rewound "Dev:TS3310-drv0" (/dev/IBMtape1n)
*status
Bacula status: file=0 block=0
Device status: BOT ONLINE file=-1 block=0
btape: btape.c:1799 Device s
Forgot to add, that production effect of this problem is harmful -
backups are stored correctly, unless tape does not leave the drive. When
tape is reinserted, bacula cannot rewind it and marks the tape as
"error".
Dnia 7-05-2007 o godz. 14:46 Mariusz Czulada napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>
> I have a
