Re: [Bacula-users] No pool when run Storage Status...

2010-02-15 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Oh! Gee Thanks John... > I do not know about this behavior > BTW, I would change /dev/st0 to /dev/nst0. Using /dev/st0 can cause a tape to be accidentally overwritten in bacula. John --

Re: [Bacula-users] No pool when run Storage Status...

2010-02-15 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Oh! Gee Thanks John... I do not know about this behavior Thanks ]Em Seg, 2010-02-15 às 10:04 -0500, John Drescher escreveu: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Gilberto Nunes > wrote: > > Hi folks... > > > > I have configurate bacula to make a backup to a Sony SDX-570V, and I get > > su

Re: [Bacula-users] No pool when run Storage Status...

2010-02-15 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Gilberto Nunes wrote: > Hi folks... > > I have configurate bacula to make a backup to a Sony SDX-570V, and I get > success to label a tape to lexmark-dat-full... > > However, when I run status storage against this tape, I get this: > > Device "DAT-LEXMARK" (/dev/st

[Bacula-users] No pool when run Storage Status...

2010-02-15 Thread Gilberto Nunes
Hi folks... I have configurate bacula to make a backup to a Sony SDX-570V, and I get success to label a tape to lexmark-dat-full... However, when I run status storage against this tape, I get this: Device "DAT-LEXMARK" (/dev/st0) is mounted with: Volume: lexmark-dat-full Pool: