Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-07-05 Thread Horse
I updated my arch system in the last couple of days, and bacula would not run.  I had to rebuild bacula against the updated files. This seems to have resolved the issue.  I'll let you know if there's any new problems.  Thanks for your help.Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 30

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-07-03 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT), Horse said: > > > > > > I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server. It is (and faithfully > > > has > > > been) backing up the server and 2 W

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-07-03 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:10:04 -0700 (PDT), Horse said: > > Just got back to this. No, /home is a normal directory That's very strange. Can you post the output from the "estimate listing" command (assuming that just shows the 1 file too)? BTW, don't forget to post replies to the list. __

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Christoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:54:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Moran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] > > I'll bet you a nickle that /home is a symlink to /usr/home (as is > > common with FreeBSD). > > > > In this case, "File = /home/" will work. > > > Hi Bill, >

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Christoff
Am Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:54:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In response to Christoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Am Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Horse >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server. It is (and >> faithfully >> >

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Christoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Horse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server. It is (and faithfully > > has been) backing up the server and 2 Win2k desktops. I have added an > > Archlinux

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Christoff
Hi! Try out the two added lines! Greets, Christoff Am Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Horse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server. It is (and faithfully > has been) backing up the server and 2 Win2k desktops. I have added an > Archlinux des

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:06:22 -0700 (PDT), Horse said: > > I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server. It is (and faithfully has > been) backing up the server and 2 Win2k desktops. I have added an Archlinux > desktop that is connected via wireless to the rest of my network. I have >

Re: [Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Frank Sweetser
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:06:22PM -0700, Horse wrote: > Include { > Options { > signature = SHA1 > } > > File = /home > } > } > > I run this and it estimates that it will backup 1 file; /home > If I run it that's exactly what I get; ending with no errors. Is /home a mountp

[Bacula-users] No errors - No backup

2006-06-20 Thread Horse
I'm running Bacula 1.36.2 on my Archlinux server.  It is (and faithfully has been) backing up the server and 2 Win2k desktops.  I have added an Archlinux desktop that is connected via wireless to the rest of my network.  I have added a very simple fileset to my bacula-dir.conf:FileSet {Name = "NewS