Re: [Bacula-users] NTBACKUP or regedit /e or VSS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is wpkg free, BTW? I realize we're a little off-topic at this point.
Jeff Richards wrote:
> For what it's worth I use VSS, NTBackup, and USMT to give myself the
> most flexibility with restores.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is wpkg free, BTW? I realize we're a little off-topic at this point.
Jeff Richards wrote:
> For what it's worth I use VSS, NTBackup, and USMT to give myself the
> most flexibility with restores. I also used setacl when I had to
> restore a XP Home ba
For what it's worth I use VSS, NTBackup, and USMT to give myself the most
flexibility with restores. I also used setacl when I had to restore a XP Home
backup into a XP Pro installation (just user data). Later I played with wpkg
for automatic software installation, etc. so I can install a base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think it depends on what you're trying to backup. I'm not really a
Windows backup person, but my understanding is that NTBackup is better
at writing out what it calls a "system state" than other ways. Perhaps
if you never intend to need to restore th
I just wanted to reassure myself:
If I use VSS I don't need ntbackup or regedit /e or something like that.
Is that correct?
Yours sincerely,
Eric Böse-Wolf
pgpmnXE0UcYKH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
This SF.net email i
