[Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool

2012-08-06 Thread Alberto Viana
Hi Jummo, I find out what what I was doing wrong. In my storage conf I put separated tapes instead to use the my Autochanger device: Here´s the right conf: # DELL PowerVault LTO-5 - Drive 1 Storage { Name = PV-TL2000 Address = IP_ADDR SDPort = 9103 Password = "pas

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool

2012-08-04 Thread Jummo
Hi Alberto, I have 2 tape libraries and everything is working fine but what I need is: if a job starts and uses the first tape, the second one automatically uses the second tape. Is that possible to do that? Do you have 2 tape drives in an auto-changer? Or two dedicated tape drives directly

[Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool

2012-08-03 Thread Alberto Viana
I´m running bacula 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.1 (64bits) I have 2 tape libraries and everything is working fine but what I need is: if a job starts and uses the first tape, the second one automatically uses the second tape. Is that possible to do that? For exemple, I have 2 servers (SeverA and ServerB) Her

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool?

2009-03-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi John, thanks for the info, I'll create a 2nd backup pool for the new device then. All the best, Uwe -- uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net phone: [+49] 5242.91- 4740 fax:-9722 Hauptsitz: Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Guetersloh, Germany Registergericht Guetersloh HRB 4196, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Horst G

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool?

2009-03-16 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to add a 2nd tape library to one of our bacula servers which > is running out of space. Is it possible to define jobs in such a way > that bacula itself will take care of which storage the job actually > ends up in / o

[Bacula-users] Multiple Storage devices in a single Pool?

2009-03-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, I'd like to add a 2nd tape library to one of our bacula servers which is running out of space. Is it possible to define jobs in such a way that bacula itself will take care of which storage the job actually ends up in / on? My idea was to label the tapes in the new library so that they