Hi,
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
> My company has requested this feature (copy jobs between multiple SDs)
> and is willing to pay half of what Bacula Systems wants for
> implementing. They asked for 10k€ and we are willing to pay 5k€.
We're also interested in this feature. If nee
On 05/01/2010 17:40, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>
>> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
>> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
>>
> Actually, it'll decrease it rather drastically. All the way to none
One of the changes in the pipeline seems to be making the SD multi
threaded. Thus if you use a single SD it will be able to use multiple
CPU's going forward. I don't know what the ETA is, but I look forward
to that change.
-Jason
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 12:56 -05
Daniel Holtkamp wrote:
> Hello !
>
> On 1/5/10 6:40 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Brian Debelius wrote:
>>> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
>>> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
>> Actually, it'll decrease it rather drastic
Hello !
On 1/5/10 6:40 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
>> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
>
> Actually, it'll decrease it rather drastically. All the way to none.
G
Hrumph...sigh.
On 1/5/2010 12:40 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>
>> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
>> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
>>
> Actually, it'll decrease it rather drastically. Al
Brian Debelius wrote:
> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
Actually, it'll decrease it rather drastically. All the way to none.
You see, at the present time you cannot copy or migrate from
Doh! I guess I will find out in a minute or two.
On 1/5/2010 12:29 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Brian Debelius
> wrote:
>
>> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
>> on another sd process, would increase throughput during cop
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Brian Debelius
wrote:
> I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
> on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
>
I thought migration and copy jobs only work for a single SD. This may
have changed since I have
I want to see if having disk storage on one sd process, and tape storage
on another sd process, would increase throughput during copy jobs.
On 1/5/2010 11:48 AM, Tino Schwarze wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:23:01AM -0500, Brian Debelius wrote:
>
>
>> Can I have one director and two SD's
>
> Hey,
>
> Can I have one director and two SD's on the same box?
>
May be wrong, but as I understand it, as long as they (multiple SD's) have
differing names (eg hostname-sd1 & hostname-sd2), differing ports and access
different logical devices, I can't see why not.
Although, am not sure w
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:23:01AM -0500, Brian Debelius wrote:
> Can I have one director and two SD's on the same box?
Why do you need two SDs?
Tino.
--
"What we nourish flourishes." - "Was wir nähren erblüht."
www.lichtkreis-chemnitz.de
www.tisc.de
-
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Brian Debelius
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Can I have one director and two SD's on the same box?
>
I believe that will be fine as long as you give them different ports.
You will have to create your own init script to start the other sd
with a different port and config.
Joh
Hey,
Can I have one director and two SD's on the same box?
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to
14 matches
Mail list logo
