Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency [SOLVED]

2010-08-24 Thread Proskurin Kirill
On 24/08/10 01:35, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Allow Mixed Priority Thanks for great answer! -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innova

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 08/23/10 15:53, Proskurin Kirill wrote: > 23.08.2010 20:05, Phil Stracchino пишет: >> On 08/23/10 07:05, Proskurin Kirill wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> What we have: >>> FreeBSD-8.0 >>> Bacula-5.0.2 >>> >>> Backup on HDD. Every Job have they own pool and own storage. >>> >>> Most confusing thing in

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Fahrer, Julian
There is an option "allow mixed priorites". I guess this is what you want Mit freundlichem Gruß Julian Fahrer - Originalnachricht - Von: Proskurin Kirill An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Gesendet: Mon Aug 23 21:53:40 2010 Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum c

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 08/23/2010 09:53 PM, Proskurin Kirill wrote: > 23.08.2010 20:05, Phil Stracchino пишет: >> On 08/23/10 07:05, Proskurin Kirill wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> What we have: >>> FreeBSD-8.0 >>> Bacula-5.0.2 >>> >>> Backup on HDD. Every Job have they own pool and own storage. >>> >>> Most confusing thin

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Proskurin Kirill
23.08.2010 20:05, Phil Stracchino пишет: > On 08/23/10 07:05, Proskurin Kirill wrote: >> Hello. >> >> What we have: >> FreeBSD-8.0 >> Bacula-5.0.2 >> >> Backup on HDD. Every Job have they own pool and own storage. >> >> Most confusing thing in bacula after retention policy is a concurrency. >> What

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 08/23/10 07:05, Proskurin Kirill wrote: > Hello. > > What we have: > FreeBSD-8.0 > Bacula-5.0.2 > > Backup on HDD. Every Job have they own pool and own storage. > > Most confusing thing in bacula after retention policy is a concurrency. > What I need to do to make jobs not wait for previous

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Derek Harkness
To get get maximum concurrency you need 1 storage device per pool. Only one pool on a storage device can be open at a time. The other approach is to have multiple jobs use the same pool with a high enough maximum concurrency set. Multiple jobs will be written to the pool no waiting. Derek O

[Bacula-users] Maximum concurrency

2010-08-23 Thread Proskurin Kirill
Hello. What we have: FreeBSD-8.0 Bacula-5.0.2 Backup on HDD. Every Job have they own pool and own storage. Most confusing thing in bacula after retention policy is a concurrency. What I need to do to make jobs not wait for previous to end? Priority is now work here. -- Best regards, Prosku