On Monday 31 July 2006 19:49, Birger Blixt wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> > What OS are you using?
> >
> >
> I forgot to write that, sorry.
>
> At home I run Suse 9.3 at my server, and 10.0 , 10.1 as clients,
> and have no problems to build my own binaries or install rpm's that
> other shar
Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> What OS are you using?
>
>
I forgot to write that, sorry.
At home I run Suse 9.3 at my server, and 10.0 , 10.1 as clients,
and have no problems to build my own binaries or install rpm's that
other share.
The machine at my work is a retired Sun 450 , Solaris8 , since I c
On Monday 31 July 2006 16:33, Robert W Hartzell wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 31 July 2006 12:41, Birger Blixt wrote:
> >> On 2006-07-28 14:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> Well, If I start bacula without any tapes loaded, then bacula-sd will
loop
> > for
> >> about one hour / drive b
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 31 July 2006 12:41, Birger Blixt wrote:
>> On 2006-07-28 14:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Well, If I start bacula without any tapes loaded, then bacula-sd will loop
> for
>> about one hour / drive before I can connect to it, so I make sure the drive
> has
>> tapes b
On Monday 31 July 2006 13:00, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> One of the more annoying problems is that it will insist on recycling
> >> tapes which are not in the changer, then block on loading them, when
there
> >> are purged recycling-candidate tapes availab
On Monday 31 July 2006 12:41, Birger Blixt wrote:
> On 2006-07-28 14:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >
> > As long as Bacula is using all the drives exclusively and you start with
no
> > tape in any drive, and you are using the appropriate Autochanger resource,
> > Bacula will know what is tape in
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> One of the more annoying problems is that it will insist on recycling
>> tapes which are not in the changer, then block on loading them, when there
>> are purged recycling-candidate tapes available in the changer.
>
> Yes, this is probably to be expected
On 2006-07-28 14:34, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> As long as Bacula is using all the drives exclusively and you start with no
> tape in any drive, and you are using the appropriate Autochanger resource,
> Bacula will know what is tape in all the drives.
Well, If I start bacula without any tapes loa
Please always copy the list.
Hopefully someone will explain it to you.
On Friday 28 July 2006 22:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In the message dated: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:46:23 +0200,
> The pithy ruminations from Kern Sibbald on
> were:
> => On Friday 28 July 2006 18:01, Alan Brown wrote:
> =
On Friday 28 July 2006 18:01, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > There are certain limitations in version 1.38.x, that are explained in the
> > release notes I think -- mainly, if a tape is in drive 2 and Bacula is
> > writing on drive 1 and then wants to write on t
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> There are certain limitations in version 1.38.x, that are explained in the
> release notes I think -- mainly, if a tape is in drive 2 and Bacula is
> writing on drive 1 and then wants to write on the tape that is in drive 2, it
> will unload it from drive
On Friday 28 July 2006 12:26, Birger Blixt wrote:
> On 2006-07-26 10:46, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >
> > On many non-autochanger drives, doing an eject requires an explicit "load"
> > command, and Bacula never uses that command (except in btape). I
recommend
> > avoiding ejecting except if requ
On 2006-07-26 10:46, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> On many non-autochanger drives, doing an eject requires an explicit "load"
> command, and Bacula never uses that command (except in btape). I recommend
> avoiding ejecting except if required.
>
Yeas, but that is not at all what I wrote, the proble
Hello,
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 14:57, Birger Blixt wrote:
> On 2006-07-20 11:46, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Ah, nice. That is the kind of feedback that I love :-)
> >
> > And, yes, the directive names are not always terribly logical or
descriptive.
> >
> > On Thursday 20 July 2006 11:23, Birger Bl
On 2006-07-19 16:42, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Look at the "Prefer Mounted Drives" directive.
>
Thanks Kern, that was it, I had it set to yes :-(
Now all 4 tapes is running at the same time :-)
/birre
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cas
Look at the "Prefer Mounted Drives" directive.
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 14:17, Birger Blixt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an Autochanger with 4 drives:
> Autochanger {
>Name = "ADIC-480"
>Device = DRIVE0, DRIVE1, DRIVE2, DRIVE3
>Changer Device = /dev/changer
>Changer Command = "/opt/loc
Hi!
I have an Autochanger with 4 drives:
Autochanger {
Name = "ADIC-480"
Device = DRIVE0, DRIVE1, DRIVE2, DRIVE3
Changer Device = /dev/changer
Changer Command = "/opt/local/etc/mtx-changer %c %o %S %a %d"
}
In the past I was using 4 drives that was using the same mtx-changer script
wi
17 matches
Mail list logo
