Re: [Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-09 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:49:55PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > On 08/07/13 19:48, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > On 07/08/13 12:15, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > >> I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst > >> problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes t

Re: [Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-08 Thread Erik P. Olsen
On 08/07/13 19:48, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 07/08/13 12:15, Erik P. Olsen wrote: >> I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst >> problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes to >> generate the file selection tree. When fedora 19 became available

Re: [Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-08 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 07/08/13 12:15, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst > problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes to > generate the file selection tree. When fedora 19 became available and > with the information that they supported

Re: [Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 07/08/2013 06:15 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst > problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes to > generate the file selection tree. When fedora 19 became available and > with the information that they suppo

[Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-08 Thread Erik P. Olsen
I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes to generate the file selection tree. When fedora 19 became available and with the information that they supported MariaDB I dec