Re: [Bacula-users] Looking for a better setup

2008-11-16 Thread John Drescher
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2008, at 3:07 PM, John Drescher wrote: > >>> I have a similar problem with postgres; the catalog database is now so >>> large that restoring it from a pg_dump backup takes 3-4 hours. This is >>> before you acco

Re: [Bacula-users] Looking for a better setup

2008-11-16 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 15, 2008, at 3:07 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> I have a similar problem with postgres; the catalog database is now >> so >> large that restoring it from a pg_dump backup takes 3-4 hours. >> This is >> before you account for the length of time taken to read it from the >> tape. Talki

Re: [Bacula-users] Looking for a better setup

2008-11-15 Thread John Drescher
> I have a similar problem with postgres; the catalog database is now so > large that restoring it from a pg_dump backup takes 3-4 hours. This is > before you account for the length of time taken to read it from the tape. > How big is your database? pg_dump of my 21GB database takes less than 5 mi

Re: [Bacula-users] Looking for a better setup

2008-11-12 Thread James Cort
junior.listas wrote: > 1) mysql tables became huge ( each backup adds a million and six > hundred thousand lines ), so i split the configuration into 2 daemons > with 2 different bases, one for mon,tue,wed and other for thu,fri( and > one 3th for monthly bkps ) ; because between a backup starts

[Bacula-users] Looking for a better setup

2008-11-10 Thread junior.listas
Hi all; I'm using bacula for a long time, but I always use the same configuration on all of my costumers: Full diary backups. ..and here my problems start... first of all, my diary backup take a long time, almost 8 hours, and it generates a very huge load in the servers... this "default costume