On Thursday 01 February 2007 12:34, James Harper wrote:
> > > Yes, providing you don't mind prematurely killing off non-keepalive
> > > programs
> > > that are inactive during the reduced keepalive period you have set.
> >
> > This should be relatively easy to test... assuming we can't find a
> > d
On Thursday 01 February 2007 13:10, James Harper wrote:
> > Yes, providing you don't mind prematurely killing off non-keepalive
> > programs
> > that are inactive during the reduced keepalive period you have set.
>
> I couldn't find anything definitive in the kernel source, but looking
> through it
On Thursday 01 February 2007 12:19, James Harper wrote:
> > > Try:
> > >
> > > echo 300 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time
> > > echo 60 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl
> > > echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_probes
> > >
> > > This will send the first keepalive after 5 minut
> Yes, providing you don't mind prematurely killing off non-keepalive
> programs
> that are inactive during the reduced keepalive period you have set.
>
I couldn't find anything definitive in the kernel source, but looking
through it did remind me of the TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL, and
TCP_KEEPC
> > Yes, providing you don't mind prematurely killing off non-keepalive
> > programs
> > that are inactive during the reduced keepalive period you have set.
>
> This should be relatively easy to test... assuming we can't find a
> document somewhere that clarifies it one way or another.
Okay... i
> > Try:
> >
> > echo 300 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_time
> > echo 60 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_intvl
> > echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_keepalive_probes
> >
> > This will send the first keepalive after 5 minutes, and then every
60
> > seconds after that, and will drop the connec
On Thursday 01 February 2007 01:48, James Harper wrote:
> > I think that makes any Bacula job longer than 10 minutes impossible
>
> using
>
> > this Linksys router. Looks like I'm out of luck. I have updated to
>
> the
>
> > newest firmware, and the Linksys config doesn't have any ability to
>
>
As someone suggested, you might try using different firmware. There are
a lot of options for these linksyses. DD-WRT is definitely one of them
but I personally prefer "tomato".
James Harper wrote:
>> I think that makes any Bacula job longer than 10 minutes impossible
>>
> using
>
>> th
> > For now, I'm giving up on having an offsite storage daemon. I don't
> > have the money to spend on a fully working router. So I'm going to
> > just keep the storage daemon on the same machine as the director,
and
> > then rsync the physical volumes afterwards offsite.
>
> Though this is bett
> I think that makes any Bacula job longer than 10 minutes impossible
using
> this Linksys router. Looks like I'm out of luck. I have updated to
the
> newest firmware, and the Linksys config doesn't have any ability to
modify
> the timeout value. I suppose I could buy a new router, or set up a
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 13:40 -0800, Brad Peterson wrote:
> >> Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G
> v5
> >> router IS dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
>
> >Set heartbeat intervals to 1 minute.
>
> >Problem solved (and is why this directive is ther
>> Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G v5
>> router IS dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
>Set heartbeat intervals to 1 minute.
>Problem solved (and is why this directive is there)
I already have the heartbeats in at 30 seconds each. Unfortunatel
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I personally I would ask for a refund on the router since it apparently
> doesn't understand keepalive and doesn't follow standard TCP/IP standards so
> does not function properly.
Fat chance of that. Linksys are notorious for lack of response to consume
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Brad Peterson wrote:
> Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G v5
> router IS dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
Set heartbeat intervals to 1 minute.
Problem solved (and is why this directive is there)
--
>> Kern, if you are reading this, what are the chances that a heartbeat could
>> be implemented between the director and the storage daemon?
>Yes, that is possible, but you will need to find someone to program it.
If I knew my C++ well enough, I'd dive into it. :) Darn my lack of C++
knowled
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 20:05, Brad Peterson wrote:
> Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G v5
> router IS dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
>
> I verified this through a process of elimination. Any time the Linksys
> router was used, I'd get a s
> Kern, if you are reading this, what are the chances that a
> heartbeat could be implemented between the director and the storage
> daemon?
Would there be any significant downsides to a global heartbeat
directive in the director? When the director initially connects to an
FD/SD it could m
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:05 -0800, Brad Peterson wrote:
> Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G v5
> router IS dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
>
> I verified this through a process of elimination. Any time the
> Linksys router was used, I'd get a
Aaah, I've finally figured it out. The very common Linksys WRT54G v5 router IS
dropping inactive sockets after exactly 10 minutes.
I verified this through a process of elimination. Any time the Linksys router
was used, I'd get a socket drop at 10 minutes (wireless or ethernet cable
included)
19 matches
Mail list logo
