Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-20 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hi Thank you for all your suggestions. We work currently with the distributions packages, and they are in 5.x version (in CentOS 7). But I saw that Debian Stretch will provide 7.4 version, it may be a good opportunity to migrate :-) Also, good idea to disable compression for some file extensions

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 02/18/2017 09:01 PM, compdoc wrote: > On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > >> I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" >> in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied > I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Mike Ruskai
On 2/17/2017 04:18, Norbert Gomes wrote: > Hi list ! > > GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it > increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network > transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression > > I read that LZO would be fa

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/18/17 15:01, compdoc wrote: > On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > >> I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" >> in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied > > I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread compdoc
On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" > in the FileSet Include Options), no compression is applied I use LZO to backup my jpeg images, that are stored on SSDs. I used to use gzip2 for speed, and in the hopes it wou

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-18 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello, Norbert, >> And also, have you got some ideas to speed up my backups using >> compression (GZIP1 or GZIP6 gives the same level of performance) ? No, they don't. Please find this performance analysis: http://bacula.us/bacula-compression-analysis/ >> Regards >> >> Norbert Regards, -- ==

Re: [Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 02/17/2017 10:18 AM, Norbert Gomes wrote: > Hi list ! > > GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it > increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network > transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression > > I read that LZO would b

[Bacula-users] LZO compression on Windows Client

2017-02-17 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hi list ! GZIP compression is quite slow on our Windows clients (5.2.10), it increases a lot the duration of theses backups. The speed of the network transfer is at: 20 MB/s with GZIP and 100 MB/s without compression I read that LZO would be faster, but when I enable it (compression="LZO" in the